Warren-Newport Public Library District
Lake County, Illinois
Board of Trustees
Adopted: July 16, 1996
Reviewed/Revised: February 13, 2001; March 9, 2004; February 20, 2007; March 19, 2013;
September 17, 2013; June 17, 2014; December 20, 2016; June 19, 2018;
March 17, 2020; November 16, 2021; March 21, 2023
ARTICLE 1. INTRODUCTION
The goal of materials selection for the Warren-Newport Public Library District (WNPLD) is to
provide all people who enter the Warren-Newport Public Library (WNPL) with a variety of materials
to meet their informational, educational, cultural, and recreational needs. WNPLD strives, within
the limits of its budget and space, to build a comprehensive collection of popular materials based
on the needs of the community. The collection provides materials for patrons of all ages. This
selection policy defines the standards for and outlines the responsibility for materials selection for
ARTICLE 2. PHILOSOPHY OF ACCESS
Section 2.01 Access
Access to information is one of the cornerstones of democracy, and WNPLD supports the right to
have access to information and ideas representing various points of view. The principles on which
this policy is based are expressed in the American Library Association’s Bill of Rights and in the
Freedom to Read and Freedom to View statements (Exhibits A, B, and C) included in this policy.
Section 2.02 Diversity of Viewpoint
WNPLD serves a diverse population, and it is the responsibility of WNPLD to provide materials
that reflect various points of view on controversial issues, as such materials become available.
Controversial materials have no distinguishing labels and are shelved in the general collection.
The selection of an item does not imply an endorsement of the opinion expressed or of the author.
Section 2.03 Open Shelf Policy
Policy 3001 Access to Materials states “that decisions regarding which library materials and
services a person of legal age will use rests entirely with that person. It is the responsibility of the
parents of a child to guide those decisions for the child, but the standards parents are free to
impose on their own children shall not be imposed on other children.” Selection of adult materials
will not be influenced by the possibility that materials may be viewed or read by children, and an
open shelf policy will be followed at all times.
ARTICLE 3. RESPONSIBILITY FOR SELECTION
Overall responsibility for selection of materials rests with the Executive Director, who operates
within the framework of policies determined by the Board of Library Trustees. The Executive
Director delegates or shares this responsibility with designated members of the staff. In addition,
patrons may suggest items for purchase. All requests are given consideration, but only those
items that meet the standard criteria for selection (see Article 5 below) will be added to the
ARTICLE 4. SCOPE OF THE COLLECTION
WNPL is a medium-sized library with a focus on popular materials. Through careful selection,
WNPLD strives to maintain a diverse collection of quality materials, including items of
contemporary significance and permanent value, as well as a selection of materials concerning
social issues and ephemeral items. Because WNPLD serves a public with a wide range of ages,
educational backgrounds, and reading skills, it seeks to select materials of varying complexity.
Although WNPLD tries to serve students’ needs as much as possible, textbooks are usually not
purchased unless they are considered the best source of information on a given subject.
ARTICLE 5. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION
Section 5.01 General Criteria
The general criteria considered in selecting materials include:
• suitability of subject, style, and reading level for the intended audience;
• reputation and/or significance of author, publisher, director, and/or producer;
• attention given by critics, reviewers, professional book selection aids, and the public;
• existing and anticipated public demand;
• accuracy, clarity, and objectivity of content;
• availability of and access to the same material at other area libraries or community
• consideration of the work as a whole;
• relevance to community needs;
• relation to existing collection and other materials on the subject;
• accessibility and suitability of the physical format;
• importance as a document of local historical significance;
• need for additional or duplicate materials in the existing collection;
• the physical limitations of the building; and
• cost and budget.
Section 5.02 Interlibrary Loan
If an item is out of print or does not meet WNPLD’s criteria for purchase, WNPLD cardholders
may request the item through interlibrary loan. (See Policy 3025 Interlibrary Loan)
ARTICLE 6. SELECTION TOOLS
In addition to their professional expertise, librarians depend on reliable selection aids and reviews
found in a variety of standard sources.
ARTICLE 7. SPECIAL NEEDS
The Library recognizes the importance of acquiring materials in formats that can be utilized by
patrons with disabilities. WNPLD will seek to match community demand with the existing
collections of such materials and will be alert for new formats that could be useful to patrons with
ARTICLE 8. COLLECTION MAINTENANCE
In order to maintain the best possible collection of materials, WNPLD staff weeds the collection
continually. Items are withdrawn if they are outdated, if they no longer circulate, if there are more
duplicate copies than are needed, or if they are in poor physical condition. Items that are
withdrawn from the collection are plainly marked and may be donated to the Friends of the Library
ARTICLE 9. REVISION OF SELECTION POLICY
Pursuant to the State Statute (75 ILCS 16/30-60), and because the needs of the community
change, this materials selection policy is reviewed at least every two (2) years and revised as
ARTICLE 10. OUTREACH/BOOKMOBILE COLLECTION
The outreach/bookmobile collection includes a variety of popular materials for all ages. Due to
space constraints, the bookmobile does not carry all the formats that are included in the main
ARTICLE 11. REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION OF LIBRARY MATERIAL
Section 11.01 Freedom to Read
All individuals have the right to choose which library materials they use. However, no one has the
right to restrict the freedom of others to read whatever they wish. No book or other material in
question will be automatically removed from the collection because of an objection to it. These
principles are expressed in the American Library Association’s Library Bill of Rights, Freedom to
Read Statement, and Freedom to View Statement (Exhibits A, B, and C).
Section 11.02 Request for Reconsideration
A patron who resides in the Warren-Newport Public Library District and wishes to file a request
for reconsideration of library materials should complete the Library Material Reconsideration Form
Section 11.03 Review Process
When the Library Material Reconsideration Form is completely filled out and returned to the
Library, the appropriate Department Head will review the complaint and the material and provide
a report and recommendation for the Executive Director.
The Executive Director will respond in writing to the patron who initiated the complaint within
fifteen (15) business days, informing the patron of the decision regarding the material in question.
Section 11.04 Further Action
A patron desiring further action can make a written request for a hearing before the Board of
Library Trustees, which has final authority.
Section 11.05 ALA Reporting
The American Library Association (ALA) Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF) maintains a
confidential database of challenged materials used for statistical purposes. WNPLD will report
formal challenges by identifying the title, format, library type (public), and state of origin to the ALA
LIBRARY BILL OF RIGHTS
The American Library Association affirms that all libraries are forums for information and ideas,
and that the following basic policies should guide their services.
I. Books and other library resources should be provided for the interest, information, and
enlightenment of all people of the community the library serves. Materials should not be excluded
because of the origin, background, or views of those contributing to their creation.
II. Libraries should provide materials and information presenting all points of view on current and
historical issues. Materials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal
III. Libraries should challenge censorship in the fulfillment of their responsibility to provide
information and enlightenment.
IV. Libraries should cooperate with all persons and groups concerned with resisting abridgment
of free expression and free access to ideas.
V. A person’s right to use a library should not be denied or abridged because of origin, age,
background, or views.
VI. Libraries which make exhibit spaces and meeting rooms available to the public they serve
should make such facilities available on an equitable basis, regardless of the beliefs or affiliations
of individuals or groups requesting their use.
VII. All people, regardless of origin, age, background, or views, possess a right to privacy and
confidentiality in their library use. Libraries should advocate for, educate about, and protect
people’s privacy, safeguarding all library use data, including personally identifiable information.
Adopted June 19, 1939, by the ALA Council; amended October 14, 1944; June 18, 1948; February 2, 1961;
June 27, 1967; January 23, 1980; January 29, 2019.
Inclusion of “age” reaffirmed January 23, 1996.
THE FREEDOM TO READ STATEMENT
The freedom to read is essential to our democracy. It is continuously under attack. Private groups
and public authorities in various parts of the country are working to remove or limit access to
reading materials, to censor content in schools, to label "controversial" views, to distribute lists of
"objectionable" books or authors, and to purge libraries. These actions apparently rise from a view
that our national tradition of free expression is no longer valid; that censorship and suppression
are needed to avoid the subversion of politics and the corruption of morals. We, as citizens
devoted to reading as librarians and publishers responsible for disseminating ideas, wish to assert
the public interest in the preservation of the freedom to read.
Most attempts at suppression rest on a denial of the fundamental premise of democracy: that the
ordinary individual, by exercising critical judgment, will select the good and reject the bad. We
trust Americans to recognize propaganda and misinformation, and to make their own decisions
about what they read and believe. We do not believe they are prepared to sacrifice their heritage
of a free press in order to be “protected” against what others think may be bad for them. We
believe they still favor free enterprise in ideas and expressions.
These efforts at suppression are related to a larger pattern of pressures being brought against
education, the press, art and images, films, broadcast media, and the Internet. The problem is
not only one of actual censorship. The shadow of fear cast by these pressures leads, we suspect,
to an even larger voluntary curtailment of expression by those who seek to avoid controversy or
unwelcome scrutiny by government officials.
Such pressure toward conformity is perhaps natural to a time of accelerated change. And yet
suppression is never more dangerous than in such a time of social tension. Freedom has given
the United States the elasticity to endure strain. Freedom keeps open the path of novel and
creative solutions, and enables change to come by choice. Every silencing of a heresy, every
enforcement of an orthodoxy, diminishes the toughness and resilience of our society and leaves
it the less able to deal with controversy and difference.
Now as always in our history, reading is among our greatest freedoms. The freedom to read and
write is almost the only means for making generally available ideas or manners of expression that
can initially command only a small audience. The written word is the natural medium for the new
idea and the untried voice from which come the original contributions to social growth. It is
essential to the extended discussion that serious thought requires, and to the accumulation of
knowledge and ideas into organized collections.
We believe that free communication is essential to the preservation of a free society and a creative
culture. We believe that these pressures towards conformity present the danger of limiting the
range and variety of inquiry and expression on which our democracy and our culture depend. We
believe that every American community must jealously guard the freedom to publish and to
circulate, in order to preserve its own freedom to read. We believe that publishers and librarians
have a profound responsibility to give validity to that freedom to read by making it possible for the
readers to choose freely from a variety of offerings.
The freedom to read is guaranteed by the Constitution. Those with faith in free people will stand
firm on these constitutional guarantees of essential rights and will exercise the responsibilities
that accompany these rights.
We therefore affirm these propositions:
1. It is in the public interest for publishers and librarians to make available the wisest diversity of
views and expressions, including those that are unorthodox, unpopular, or considered
dangerous by the majority.
Creative thought is by definition new, and what is new is different. The bearer of every new
thought is a rebel until that idea is refined and tested. Totalitarian systems attempt to maintain
themselves in power by the ruthless suppression of any concept which challenges the
established orthodoxy. The power of a democratic system to adapt to change is vastly
strengthened by the freedom of its citizens to choose widely from among conflicting opinions
offered freely to them. To stifle every nonconformist idea at birth would mark the end of the
democratic process. Furthermore, only through the constant activity of weighing and selecting
can the democratic mind attain the strength demanded by times like these. We need to know
not only what we believe but why we believe it.
2. Publishers, librarians, and booksellers do not need to endorse every idea or presentation they
make available. It would conflict with the public interest for them to establish their own political,
moral or aesthetic views as a standard for determining what should be published or circulated.
Publishers and librarians serve the educational process by helping to make available
knowledge and ideas required for the growth of the mind and the increase of learning. They
do not foster education by imposing as mentors the patterns of their own thought. The people
should have the freedom to read and consider a broader range of ideas than those that may
be held by any single librarian or publisher or government or church. It is wrong that what one
can read should be confined to what another thinks proper.
3. It is contrary to the public interest for publishers or librarians to bar access to writings on the
basis of the personal history or political affiliations of the author.
No art or literature can flourish if it is to be measured by the political views or private lives of
its creators. No society of free people can flourish that draws up lists of writers to whom it will
not listen, whatever they may have to say.
4. There is no place in our society for efforts to coerce the taste of others, to confine adults to
the reading matter deemed suitable for adolescents, or to inhibit the efforts of writers to
achieve artistic expression.
To some, much of modern literature is shocking. But is not much of life itself shocking? We
cut off literature at the source if we prevent writers from dealing with the stuff of life. Parents
and teachers have a responsibility to prepare the young to meet the diversity of experiences
in life to which they will be exposed, as they have a responsibility to help them learn to think
critically for themselves. These are affirmative responsibilities, not to be discharged simply by
preventing them from reading works for which they are not yet prepared. In these matters,
values differ, and values cannot be legislated; nor can machinery be devised which will suit
the demands of one group without limiting the freedom of others.
5. It is not in the public interest to force a reader to accept the prejudgment of a label
characterizing any expression or its author as subversive or dangerous.
The ideal of labeling presupposes the existence of individuals or groups with wisdom to
determine by authority what is good or bad for others. It presupposes that individuals must be
directed in making up their minds about the ideas they examine. But Americans do not need
others to do their thinking for them.
6. It is the responsibility of publishers and librarians, as guardians of the people's freedom to
read, to contest encroachments upon that freedom by individuals or groups seeking to impose
their own standards or tastes upon the community at large; and by the government whenever
it seeks to reduce or deny public access to public information.
It is inevitable in the give and take of the democratic process that the political, the moral, or
the aesthetic concepts of an individual or group will occasionally collide with those of another
individual or group. In a free society, individuals are free to determine for themselves what
they wish to read, and each group is free to determine what it will recommend to its freely
associated members. But no group has the right to take the law into its own hands, and to
impose its own concept of politics or morality upon other members of a democratic society.
Freedom is no freedom if it is accorded only to the accepted and the inoffensive. Further,
democratic societies are more safe, free, and creative when the free flow of public information
is not restricted by governmental prerogative or self-censorship.
7. It is the responsibility of publishers and librarians to give full meaning to the freedom to read
by providing books that enrich the quality and diversity of thought and expression. By the
exercise of this affirmative responsibility, they can demonstrate that the answer to a “bad”
book is a good one, the answer to a “bad” idea is a good one.
The freedom to read is of little consequence when the reader cannot obtain matter fit for that
reader's purpose. What is needed is not only the absence of restraint, but the positive
provision of opportunity for the people to read the best that has been thought and said. Books
are the major channel by which the intellectual inheritance is handed down, and the principal
means of its testing and growth. The defense of the freedom to read requires of all publishers
and librarians the utmost of their faculties and deserves of all citizens the fullest of their
We state these propositions neither lightly nor as easy generalizations. We here stake out a lofty
claim for the value of the written word. We do so because we believe that it is possessed of
enormous variety and usefulness, worthy of cherishing and keeping free. We realize that the
application of these propositions may mean the dissemination of ideas and manners of expression
that are repugnant to many persons. We do not state these propositions in the comfortable belief
that what people read is unimportant. We believe rather that what people read is deeply important;
that ideas can be dangerous; but that the suppression of ideas is fatal to a democratic society.
Freedom itself is a dangerous way of life, but it is ours.
This statement was originally issued in May of 1953 by the Westchester Conference of the American Library
Association and the American Book Publishers Council, which in 1970 consolidated with the American
Educational Publishers Institute to become the Association of American Publishers.
Adopted June 25, 1953, by the ALA Council and the AAP Freedom to Read Committee; amended January
28, 1972; January 16, 1991; July 12, 2000; June 30, 2004.
FREEDOM TO VIEW STATEMENT
The Freedom to View, along with the freedom to speak, to hear, and to read, is protected by the
First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. In a free society, there is no place for
censorship of any medium of expression. Therefore, these principles are affirmed:
1. To provide the broadest possible access to film, video, and other audiovisual materials
because they are a means for the communication of ideas. Liberty of circulation is
essential to insure the constitutional guarantee of freedom of expression.
2. To protect the confidentiality of all individuals and institutions using film, video, and other
3. To provide film, video, and other audiovisual materials which represent a diversity of views
and expression. Selection of a work does not constitute or imply agreement with or
approval of the content.
4. To provide a diversity of viewpoints without the constraint of labeling or prejudging film,
video and other audiovisual materials on the basis of the moral, religious, or political beliefs
of the producer or filmmaker or on the basis of controversial content.
5. To contest vigorously, by all lawful means, every encroachment upon the public’s freedom
This statement was originally drafted by the Freedom to View Committee of the American Film
and Video Association (formerly the Educational Film Library Association) and was adopted by
the AFVA Board of Directors of February 1978. This statement was updated and approved by the
AFVA Board of Directors in 1989.
Endorsed January 10, 1990, by the ALA Council
Warren-Newport Public Library District
Lake County, Illinois
LIBRARY MATERIAL RECONSIDERATION FORM
Name: _____________________________________ Phone: __________________________
Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________
WNPLD Library Card Number: ______________________ Email: ______________________
_______ Individual _______ Organization, list name __________________________________
_______ Other, list name(s) _____________________________________________________
Format: _________________________ Publisher or Distributor: ________________________
1. Have you read or viewed the entire work? □ Yes □ No
If not, what parts have you read or viewed? ___________________________________
2. What do you find objectionable in the material? (Please be specific; cite pages or sections)
3. Have you read any reviews of this material? □ Yes □ No
If yes, please specify: _____________________________________________________
4. What would you like the Library to do about this material?
5. Can you recommend other material that would convey a similar picture and/or
perspective of the subject treated? □ Yes □ No
If yes, please specify. _____________________________________________________
Signature: _________________________________________ Date: ____________________